CPL. R.A. BIDGO...'s profileM.U.L.PhotosBlogListsMore ![]() | Help |
|
M.U.L.CANADA: MILITARY URBAN LEGENDS
July 18 Documents reveal military college fought to honour U.S. general
Tuesday, July 18, 2006
OTTAWA - The top officer at Canada's Royal Military College tried unsuccessfully to fight the Conservative government's decision to deny a degree to a retired American general who is critical of the U.S. government under President George W. Bush. Brig.-Gen. Jocelyn Lacroix, the college's commandant, argued the decision to award such honourary degrees was independent of the political process and even went as far to suggest Defence Minister Gordon O'Connor should use his "ministerial powers wisely" when intervening in such matters, according to records obtained by the Ottawa Citizen. The college had planned to award retired U.S. Marine Corps Gen. Anthony Zinni an honourary degree in May until O'Connor, the Prime Minister's Office and the Privy Council Office intervened and prevented that from happening. Zinni, a Vietnam combat veteran with a 35-year military career, had worked closely with senior Canadian officers during the 1992 Somalia mission as well as later while in charge of U.S. Central Command. But it was Zinni's recent decision to join five other retired American generals in criticizing U.S. Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld that led to his Canadian degree being nixed by O'Connor. Zinni criticized Rumsfeld for ignoring military advice leading up to the Iraq war as well in the aftermath of the U.S. invasion. The Harper government wants to build a better relationship with the U.S. and was concerned that awarding a degree to the general would hurt that, military officers and civilian staff at the college, based in Kingston, Ont., have said. In responding to increasing pressure to cancel Zinni's degree, Lacroix noted the college's senate had made the decision to give the officer the award. Lacroix responded in one e-mail to a senior Canadian Forces officer that the college's senate is independent and the institution's chancellor, who is O'Connor, was asked to approve Zinni's degree only as a courtesy. "The bottom line is no one at PCO or PMO can change a senate decision," he wrote in a May 12 e-mail obtained by the Ottawa Citizen. "Only the chancellor has some traction on the senate and since he is also our minister, it is recommended he uses his ministerial powers wisely." The records were released under the Access to Information Act. Lacroix is away on holidays and not available to comment, a defence official said. Royal Military College is Canada's military university and the training ground for its future officers. Privately, some Canadian officers have tried to distance themselves from the issue, noting it was a political decision made by the Harper government. Zinni's career has spanned the gamut from combat soldier to diplomat. As a young marine officer, he served two tours in Vietnam and was wounded in fighting. A year before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the U.S., Zinni sounded a warning to Congress about the threat posed by Osama bin Laden, Islamic terrorists and the Taliban. He also served as an unpaid envoy for the U.S. State Department on a Middle East peace mission. But the retired general was also critical of the U.S. going to war for a second time against Iraq, warning the conflict was not necessary at that point and would only create more enemies for America. O'Connor's decision to prevent the degree from being awarded to Zinni sparked a flurry of activity at Ottawa's defence headquarters, involving military legal advisers, the office of Chief of the Defence Staff Gen. Rick Hillier, Vice-Admiral Ron Buck, the vice chief of the defence staff, and O'Connor's chief of staff, Aaron Gairdner. Asked why Zinni's degree was cancelled, O'Connor's spokesman Etienne Allard said the minister wanted to highlight Canadian achievements at his first RMC convocation ceremony. Two retired RMC officials were given honourary degrees. In an earlier interview with the National Post, John Cowan, RMC's principal, confirmed that O'Connor made the decision not to confer the degree on the retired U.S. Marine Corps general. "The minister was concerned that doing this would appear to be taking sides in a domestic political dispute in the United States," Cowan said. But he insisted O'Connor had not interfered improperly in the decision to award the honourary degree. "This was not a ham-fisted interference in academic freedom," Cowan told the National Post. "The minister's office has been very respectful." The possibility of awarding Zinni an honourary degree might be examined again at a later date, Allard said. Ottawa Citizen July 12 This is the military," said O'Connor. "You only volunteer once."
Afghans barred from seeking compensation from CanadaAfghan civilians who are accidentally injured or killed, or whose property is damaged by Canadian soldiers have no legal right to compensation under an undisclosed arrangement signed by the two countries last year.
Instead, restitution to mostly dirt-poor villagers depends upon an obscure claims process that would provide payments under “moral considerations,” say heavily censored documents obtained by The Canadian Press under access to information laws. In the course of combat operations, “Canadian personnel will not be liable for any damages to private or government property,” said a briefing note prepared for Defence Minister Gordon O'Connor on the accidental shooting of a civilian last March in Kandahar. An arrangement between Canada and Afghanistan was signed in Kabul on Dec. 18, 2005, by the Chief of the Defence Staff, Gen. Rick Hillier, and the Afghan defence minister — the same day as a controversial agreement over the handling of detainees. The unpublicized arrangement and the detainees agreement are two separate documents, said Maj. Laurie Kannegiesser, a spokeswoman for the Canadian Forces legal branch. The deal means that when it comes to inadvertent damage or loss of life, Afghan civilians have “no legal leg to stand on, but Canada recognizes in some cases we're going to have a moral responsibility,” she said. Under the arrangement, civilians can submit damage claims and lawyers deployed with the troops are allowed to make so-called ex-gratia payments up to $2,000. “Any higher amount must be approved by the deputy minister,” said the undated note, prepared in the spring. “In most circumstances, ex-gratia payments should not be made.” However, when defence officials decide they are appropriate, the criteria under which the claims are weighed remains a closely guarded secret. Unlike the detainees agreement, which outlines the treatment and handling of Taliban prisoners, the technical arrangement has not been released publicly. An informal request by The Canadian Press for a copy of the document was denied. Instead, the Defence Department released an overview that outlines the subjects covered by the arrangement. The military also did not respond to questions, posed two weeks ago, about how many claims have been filed by Afghan civilians and whether any payments have been made. On Friday, a Canadian soldier was cleared by military police in the checkpoint shooting death of a civilian, Nasrat Ali Hassan. The family said over the weekend it has not received any compensation. Farid Ahmed, 23, Hassan's eldest son said they would consider immigration to Canada to be acceptable recompense, but haven't received any co-operation. As fighting has intensified throughout the spring in the southern part of the country, Afghan president Hamid Karzai has expressed his concern about mounting civilian casualties and damage to property. Ms. Kannegiesser said the “contents and wording” of the deal are “similar to status of force agreements” that the federal government has signed with other countries where the Canadian military has been deployed, mostly on peacekeeping duties. “In order for us to be successful in our operations there, we can't get bogged down with settlement of claims for damages that are incurred in the conduct of those operations,” she said. “It's a standard clause in these arrangements with other nations that we agree, in a gentleman's way, if damages are incurred in the course of operations that our country — Canada — won't have to pay for the damages. “Both states agree that sometimes in order to conduct operations sometimes property, land or crops and — in worst case scenario — people are damaged or hurt.” July 10 Military funding plans will attract young recruits, says air force commander18:41:19 EDT Jun 30, 2006SEAN PATRICK SULLIVANTORONTO (CP) - A slew of Canadian Forces announcements touting plans for more planes, helicopters and trucks will help attract young people toward military careers, the head of this country's air force said Friday. Canada's aging military equipment will be either replaced or bolstered through $17 billion in investments promised this week by Ottawa, including $8.3 billion announced Thursday for the purchase of 21 aircraft. The announcements are "good news" and will help counter public perception that the air force's equipment is old and not up to the job, said Lt.-Gen. Steve Lucas. The Canadian Forces also aims to rewrite its policies to better reflect a generation of young people who often try a number of jobs before settling on a career, and who might leave the military after being trained, Lucas said. "We want to make it easier for them to come back to us, and bring not only the experience they gained in the past back to us, but also any experience they might have had outside of the armed forces," said Lucas. In May, a report by the auditor general found that the military faces serious recruiting problems despite the government's ambitious plan to add 13,000 people to the ranks. "The recruiting and attrition problems that remain are jeopardizing the success of the Canadian Forces planned expansion," Auditor General Sheila Fraser said in her report. Lucas said a number of initiatives are underway to attract and keep more people in the armed forces. Those include processing new recruits more quickly and even loosening some long-standing rules about body size, in some cases opening up occupations that were previously closed to women. Lucas said the air force has recently updated requirements that previously excluded most women from becoming pilots. Vision standards are next on the list for the air force, and Lucas anticipates a report in the coming months. "Right now, we have probably the most stringent vision standards of anybody out there," he said. "We're looking at that to see if it still makes sense in today's age of corrective vision." Lucas conceded that the Canadian Forces falls short when it comes to recruiting women, aboriginals and members of visible minorities. The military better reflects Canada's population in the 1950s than its current multicultural make-up, he said. The challenge, Lucas said, is that some immigrants don't have a favourable perception of the military in their home countries, many of which may have been ruled by oppressive military regimes. Outreach offices with members of visible minorities in uniform - Lucas pointed to a one in Surrey, B.C. - are also part of the military's strategy to diversify their ranks. While the war in Iraq has made recruitment a challenge for the United States military, Canada's involvement in Afghanistan isn't having the same effect here. "The American situation is quite different. They have vast number of people deployed, and they are deploying people for much longer periods of time than we are," said Lucas. Canada's postings are spaced further apart, giving soldiers more time to recover and train before returning to a mission. 1st woman military leader in North takes over post
Canada's first woman military leader in the North has been welcomed to her new post in Yellowknife, but she says she initially didn't take the job offer seriously. "On the one hand I was thrilled that the force had the confidence in me to nominate me," Col. Christine Whitecross, the new head of Joint Task Force North, said at a ceremony Tuesday.
"But on the other hand I was a bit overwhelmed with the prospects of such a daunting task."
Whitecross replaces Col. Norm Couturier, who led the 3,460-member military unit in the vast region for the last two years. "It's one of the best days in the life of a senior officer in the Canadian Forces," Couturier said about Whitecross taking on the new job. "On the other hand, it is relinquishing command like I am about to do — it's a rather sad day." Oversees 3 territories Whitecross is now responsible for overseeing military operations in the three territories at a time of increasing concern about Canadian sovereignty over the Arctic. The military has beefed up its presence considerably in the North, expanding cadet programs and regular staffing, and holding large-scale operations the last three winters. Besides sovereignty issues, Whitecross acts as liaison between the Canadian Forces and the territorial governments. "I'm looking forward to being able to live in the local community of Yellowknife, and to do what I can for the JTFN, and I'm very happy with the confidence that the Canadian Forces has in me to be able to do that." Whitecross says she plans to focus on the work started by her predecessor, but may try out some of her own ideas on the military's role in the North. Extension for homeless families on military baseExtension for homeless families on military base Last Updated: Jul 11 2001 12:23 PM EDT The federal minister in charge of dealing with Canada's homeless has confirmed that 15 families will be allowed to stay at CFB Rockcliffe for another year.
Copyright © 2006 Canadian Broadcasting Corporation - All Rights Reserved Slain soldier 'disillusioned' by Afghanistan dutySlain soldier 'disillusioned' by Afghanistan duty
10/07/2006 4:11:02 PM
"The morale of the troops in Afghanistan is literally fantastic as it is back here in Canada," O'Connor told reporters on Monday. "If you get a chance, go and visit some of our infantry battalions around here, or our artillery battalions or armour and you'll find that you've got to hold them back, they want to go to operations." Cpl. Anthony Boneca had recently become "disillusioned" with Canada's role in the conflict, his girlfriend's father Larry DeCorte said Monday. Boneca, a reservist, didn't have the proper training to serve on the front lines where he died Sunday, DeCorte told The Canadian Press. "He expected to be on patrol, not fighting a war for someone else,'' said DeCorte. "He wasn't ready for that.'' DeCorte said the 21-year-old had become so desperate to leave Afghanistan he was considering telling an army priest he was suicidal so that he could be discharged. "He wanted to get on with his life,'' said DeCorte, who added his daughter Megan had been given a promise ring by Boneca. "It wasn't happening fast enough for him. I guess it didn't happen fast enough for him.'' But O'Connor asserted that he would be surprised to discover soldiers were being misled about the nature of their operations would consist of. "These operations are well-planned, orders are given, they're all the way down the chain of command. So I am not contesting what Cpl. Boneca said but I'd be surprised if people are misled," he said. O'Connor said reservists who travel to Afghanistan get the same training as other military personnel but that once they are in the region, they cannot choose to opt out. Boneca, a reservist from the Lake Superior Scottish Regiment in Thunder Bay, Ont., was killed Sunday after Canadian troops battled Taliban gunmen near the village of Pashmol, a recent hotbed of insurgent activity. His tour of duty was to end in three weeks. Body on its way home The casket carrying his remains is on its way home after a sombre ceremony at Kandahar airfield. Canadian troops were joined by their American, British, Romanian, French and Dutch counterparts to say good-bye as Boneca's body was loaded onto an aircraft in a sunrise ceremony Monday. Two other Canadian soldiers were wounded shortly after Boneca was killed in the same area Sunday. They suffered non-life threatening injuries. Boneca was the 17th Canadian soldier to die in Afghanistan. "He was doing outstanding work out there," said Brig.-Gen. David Fraser. "We really have to admire his professionalism and outstanding efforts to help those less fortunate." Canadian soldiers have faced increasing attacks from Taliban insurgents near the village of Pashmol, which has been a hotbed of Taliban activity in the past few months. The Pashmol area has been a main gathering point for Taliban, who have upped attacks on coalition troops and Afghan National Police outposts. In fighting on Sunday, Canadian troops had been mounting aggressive patrols near the village when they encountered the Taliban, sparking a firefight. Back-up was called in, and U.S. Apache helicopters answered by bombing targets. "This is a village long known as a Taliban stronghold," said CTV's Steve Chao, reporting from Kandahar. "The Soviets tried to take over and attack this village and failed. The Americans have been trying for months to rout the Taliban here, and they also failed. The Canadians were having a go at it, and it's been a three-day long intensive battle."
July 02 Write a Soldier
Morale by Message Board !The men and women of the Canadian Forces have demonstrated time and again that they will rise to any challenge. Let your Canadian Forces members know you appreciate their service by sending a message using this monitored message board. Click on the picture to got to the offical DND "Write To The Troops Site"
June 29 Former UN official says U.S. should learn military might has limits in IraqFormer UN official says U.S. should learn military might has limits in Iraq
Thursday, June 29, 2006
VANCOUVER (CP) - Former United Nations weapons inspector Hans Blix said the U.S. should see Iraq as a wake up call that military might has limitations. Speaking at the end of the World Peace Forum, Blix said America hasn't been successful in Iraq, either in finding weapons of mass destruction, or in pushing for democracy. "In the first place their intelligence had limitations," he said, laughing. "And secondly (there were limitations in) what you could do. You go in order to eliminate weapons, then find no weapons. Instead you say OK we'll do democracy now." Blix's allegations that the U.S. and Britain exaggerated the weapon's threat to boost support for the 2003 war against Iraq eventually proved to be accurate. He said the military action certainly hasn't been a way to fight terrorism. "On the contrary, the Iraq affair has been a breeding ground for terrorism, where there wasn't any." Blix is travelling around the world promoting a report called "Weapons of Terror," about ridding the world of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons. He told a seminar, which included members of the Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission, that many nuclear-capable countries are still thinking in the Cold War era, keeping their weapons for an enemy which no longer exists. "What would they use them for today?" he asked. "Can you use nuclear weapons against terrorists? It's like killing mosquitoes with cannons, I think." He said new weapons being developed by the United States are drawing concerns by the governments of Russia and China. Blix said the world must wake up to reality that it's in a new armament era, "and this report is meant to be such a wake up call." He believes much of the arms buildup over the past few years would not have occurred if it hadn't been for the 9-11 terror attacks. Blix said public opinion would have prevented money being spent on weapons and war. "That gave a political chance for a kind of muscular conduct, which otherwise would not have been acceptable," he said. He said it may not be politicians or military strategists that eventually force disarmament, but taxpayers who see the bills mounting. "That's a sad reflection," he said. Randy Rydell, with the Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission, said global military spending hasn't slowed down but is at about where is was during the Cold War. "Of about a trillion dollars a year. . .it's very alarming I think that this trend is heading in an upward direction," he said. Rydell hopes the disarmament report will refocus attention on the consequences and costs of the weapons. "They're not free. Tens-of-thousands still remain. They cost enormous amounts of money to maintain, and pose real risks." He said many had predicted there would be a so-called peace dividend at the end of the Cold War, where money spent on building up arms would instead be spent on things like housing and social programs. But that never materialized, he said. © The Canadian Press 2006 Taliban commander defects after help from CanadiansTaliban commander defects after help from CanadiansLast Updated Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:57:30 EDTA longtime Taliban commander treated by Canadian military doctors has renounced the hardline militant group and offered his support for Afghanistan's new government.
One month ago, Afghan police arrested Mullah Ibrahim, a Taliban official in the Kandahar region, where 2,300 Canadian soldiers are serving. At the time, he was suffering from jaundice, fell into a coma and was brought to see Canadian doctors at the main military base at the Kandahar airfield. Now recovered but in a wheelchair, Ibrahim credits God and the Canadians for saving his life. He said he has renounced his Taliban ties and urged others to join him. Ibrahim said he wants to see peace and stability in his country. Afghanistan's government has accepted him into a type of amnesty program which will see him monitored, but not prosecuted. Police will offer him some protection. A spokesperson for the Canadian Forces said the program is a form of parole and participants can't set the terms of their participation. "The objective of this program is to give an opportunity for former insurgents to reintegrate into Afghan society and live peacefully," said Capt. Julie Roberge. "It also provides an opportunity for exiles to return." Ibrahim said he last fought for the Taliban in 2001, but Canadian Forces officials in Afghanistan said he continued to have a great influence in southern Afghanistan. Over $8 billion in new military aircraft spendingOver $8 billion in new military aircraft spending
Thursday, June 29, 2006
CFB TRENTON -- Defence Minister Gordon O’Connor continued his cross-country tour of multi-billion dollar military spending announcements Thursday at CFB Trenton in Ontario. The government plans to buy four strategic airlift aircraft and 17 tactical airlift aircraft to replace the aging Hercules fleet, with a price tag of about $5 billion. Global National Online Extras » Peter Harris reports » Military gets $4.7B in new helicopters » Army gets $1.2B in logistics trucks » Navy gets $2.1B in supplys ships » Back to globalnational.com “We must make the Forces self-reliant by giving them the tools they need to succeed,” said O’Connor at a news conference. “It is only in this way that Canada can be more secure at home and have a greater impact abroad.” Another $3.3 billion will be spent on maintenance for the equipment, said O’Connor. “With a strategic airlift capability of our own we will no longer have to borrow from our allies or contract commercial aircraft, two options that come with strings attached,” O’Connor said. “In short, the new aircraft will allow Canada to deploy troops and equipment on its own terms.” The planes will be able to transport huge and heavy equipment, such as generators and mobile hospitals, over long distances at high speed and be able to land in dangerous locations, said O’Connor. O'Connor said the new equipment will mean Canada can react more quickly to domestic and international operations and crises, and thereby make the country a leader on the world stage. He said a good portion of the business will be done in Canada and he promised a quick procurement process. Thursday’s announcement was the fourth this week made by the defence minister. The government has also committed to purchase new ships, trucks and helicopters for a grand total of $17.1 billion of investment in the Canadian Forces known as the "Canada First" Defence Procurement project. On Tuesday, they were at CFB Valcartier in Quebec to announce $1.2-billion in funding for 2,300 new logistics trucks for the army -- a plan to replace the military's current fleet of aging trucks that date back to the 1980s. © CanWest News Service 2006 "Canada First" Defence Procurement-Joint Support Ship
Away from prying eyes of pressAway from prying eyes of press
Jun. 27, 2006. 01:00 AM
In the Brampton courthouse, two terror-related hearings are going on. The first set deals with the 17 men and boys charged with plotting to carry out domestic terrorist attacks, and particularly whether any of those arrested should be allowed out on bail.
I cannot tell you anything about those hearings (other than the fact they are taking place) because a justice of the peace has imposed a blanket publication ban on evidence presented there. I have also not heard any of this evidence.
What I can tell you — because this information came into the public domain well before the publication ban — is that the government maintains that some or all of the 17 were, at various times, plotting to behead the Prime Minister, blow up the Toronto Stock Exchange and take over the CBC building in downtown Toronto.
The government also claims that some of those arrested were involved in paramilitary training north of Toronto, that some tried to purchase fertilizer for use in making explosives and that the RCMP was so intimately involved in this attempt it was able to substitute a harmless white powder for the ammonium nitrate the alleged plotters were allegedly trying to buy.
Again, all of these claims were reported well before any publication ban. Some came from the RCMP and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service at a televised press conference; some came from defence lawyers citing the Crown's summary of allegations; some came from unnamed sources who claim to know the government case.
Which brings us to the second terror-related hearing going on at the Brampton courthouse. Given the fact that so many sensational allegations have already been made about the 17, another judge is being asked to rule on the question of whether a publication ban makes any sense.
This newspaper, along with the CBC, the Associated Press and The New York Times — supported by a lawyer for one of the defendants — are arguing that it doesn't. The government, along with at least one and perhaps more defence lawyers, want the ban to stay in place until the formal trial takes place — perhaps a year or two from now.
Let me let you in on a little secret. When I drove up to the Brampton courthouse yesterday morning to hear arguments about the validity of the publication ban, I was not sympathetic to the Star's position.
Newspapers beat their breasts about freedom of the press and the public's right to know. But they constantly break their own rules. About their own business operations, they can be self-serving, if not downright devious. Until recently, it was difficult to figure out the relative readerships of the Toronto dailies, so careful were they to present their competitors in the worst possible light.
Even the news itself is subject to self-censorship. Newspapers embedding reporters with Canadian troops in Afghanistan agree not to report certain details that might impair military operations. No major Canadian newspaper was willing to reprint the Danish cartoons on the Prophet Muhammad that outraged Muslims worldwide.
The point is not that any of this self-censorship is necessarily wrong. Why should newspapers give aid to their competitors, offend anyone or put Canadian troops in danger? Rather, it is that even the media think the public shouldn't know too much about some things.
In this context, publication bans on certain kinds of preliminary court hearings have some logic. The argument for such bans is that accused persons may not get a fair trial if the government is able to release damaging allegations about them in a one-sided fashion, without giving defence lawyers a meaningful chance to explain or rebut. That's why, under Canadian law, if a defendant requests a publication ban in a bail hearing, the presiding judge must grant it.
In this case, however, after spending a day cooling my heels in the Brampton courthouse and talking to some of those involved I came to the conclusion that the fairness argument simply doesn't hold water.
Paul Copeland, who is defending one of those accused, put it bluntly. In some cases, he said, publication bans can contribute to a trial's fairness. But in cases like this one, where so many of the most sensational allegations have already been revealed, they probably do no good.
Still, he's not formally addressing the media request. "I don't care about the publication ban," he said. "It's irrelevant."
Rocco Galati, who is defending another of the accused, argues strongly against the blanket nature of the ban. He says it's unconstitutional since his client didn't ask for it. Referring to what he calls the police "publicity bordello" of June 3, where the RCMP paraded alleged pieces of evidence before the news media, he says the ban is actually helping to ferment public opinion against those accused.
Star lawyers Paul Schabas, Tony Wong and Ryder Gilliland say a presiding judge should, in most cases, avoid blanket bans and apply them only to the proceedings of those defendants who specifically ask for them.
It's fair to point out that some defence lawyers in this case strongly disagree. Michael Block, who is defending one of the accused, notes that where the evidence is common to all defendants it makes no sense to issue publication bans piecemeal. "It is difficult to conceive of a case presenting more of a `real and substantial' risk to a fair trial than a highly publicized terrorism case," he writes.
My guess is that whoever hears this case will agree with Block and that the ban will stay. But I don't know for sure. Superior Court Justice Bruce Durno held a session with lawyers yesterday to try to figure out how to address this issue. But he did so in private, well away from the prying eyes of the press.
Additional articles by Thomas Walkom Ottawa to spend $1.2B on military trucksThe Conservative government announced more military spending on Tuesday, with a $1.2-billion acquisition plan for 2,300 medium-sized trucks for the Canadian Forces.
Defence Minister Gordon O'Connor made the announcement at Canadian Forces Base Valcartier in Quebec. The deal includes the trucks, related components, logistics and training support. The new vehicles will be used to carry troops and supplies both in Canada and abroad, and will replace the military's aging truck fleet. "We will build a Canadian Forces that can effectively do the job that Canadians expect of them at home and on the world stage," O'Connor said. O'Connor said up to 300 trucks in the new fleet will be armoured to protect soldiers from attack while resupplying troops on missions such as those in Afghanistan. The defence minister said companies bidding to supply the vehicles will have to deliver $1 of economic activity in Canada for every dollar they are awarded as part of the project. Cross-country spending spree The government is on a cross-Canada military spending spree this week. On Monday, O'Connor announced a $2.9-billion order for new ships and service contracts for the navy. On Wednesday, Ottawa is expected to unveil another $4.6 billion for new planes and helicopters. Canada's military truck fleet is near the end of its service life. Previous governments spent about $35,000 a vehicle to keep the trucks running and another $40,000 to upgrade trucks headed to Afghanistan. Ottawa plans to spend about $1.1 billion for the trucks and related equipment and training, and another $100 million for 20 years of contracted service support. Canada's top soldier in Afghanistan speaks out in support of President KarzaiCanada's top soldier in Afghanistan speaks out in support of President Karzai
Thursday, June 29, 2006
KANDAHAR, Afghanistan (CP) - President Hamid Karzai is a strong leader who is revered by his people and fully supports the international coalition's campaign against the Taliban, Canada's top military leader in Afghanistan said Tuesday. Brig.-Gen. David Fraser had just returned from meetings with Karzai in Kabul, where the president is under growing criticism at home and abroad over the increasingly violent insurgency and government corruption. Fraser said he got a different impression of the president as they met to discuss the coalition's military operations in Kandahar, Helmand, Uruzgan and Zabul provinces. "He (Karzai) is an incredibly charismatic man who is passionate about this country. He is a great leader who meets with elders all the time," said Fraser, the commander of the coalition's multinational brigade. "He still has the full support of the people down here. He is revered as a great leader for Afghanistan and I can't say enough about him. He is just quite a remarkable man." Only last week, Karzai called on the coalition to change its military tactics because too many Afghans, including Taliban, were being killed. The Afghan government estimates that up to 600 people have died since April, including more than 150 in the past few weeks. Coalition forces, including troops from Canada, the U.S., Britain and Romania, have been suffering casualities in some of those clashes as part of Operation Mountain Thrust, the ongoing military operation to root out Taliban in southern Afghanistan. Two British soldiers were killed in action Tuesday during a fire fight with Taliban in northern Helmand province. Six Canadians were wounded last Thursday in separate roadside bomb and suicide bomb attacks in Kandahar. Fraser said coalition troops only use force when they have to. He blamed the Taliban for the casualties. "I had a chance to talk with the president himself and went over what we are here to do to support him," Fraser said. "We are well within what he wants us to do - which is to support him in his vision of establishing an Islamic republic. We're doing it. I told the president the last thing we want to do is shoot." Karzai won a landslide election victory in 2004 on promises of political reforms and stabilizing the economy. Political commentators have been criticizing the president for re-arming illegal militias to help fight the Taliban after foreign governments spent millions of dollars to disarm these groups. Karzai has also been accused of appointing police officers known for corruption to key jobs. Fraser said the campaign to neutralize the Taliban and extend the reach of the Afghan government in remote rural areas is making progress, but will take time. Canadian forces are handing over a strongpoint near the village of Gumbad to a unit of Afghan National Army troops, a process that will continue in other areas as the training of Afghan army and police improves, he said. The coalition is investigating the idea of establishing a stronger base in Spin Boldak, a town located in southeast Kandahar only a stone's throw from the Pakistan border. The town, located astride Highway 4, is a key economic link between the two countries, he said. "The coalition presence down there will be changing over time. Canadians are right now engaged in a reconnaissance down there," Fraser said, adding it is too early to say how many troops will be posted in Spin Boldak. Earlier this year the federal government committed Canadian troops to continue operating in Afghanistan until 2009. In August, coalition forces, including the Canadians, will come under the command of NATO, which plans to step up operations in the region. Fraser warned Canadians at home not to expect a quick victory. "Is the situation tense? Yes. Is the challenge huge? Absolutely," he said. "I can tell you it won't end this summer." © The Canadian Press 2006 June 26 GG urges soldiers to take pride in Afghan missionGG urges soldiers to take pride in Afghan mission
CTV.ca News Staff In a heartfelt message to Canadian troops about to be deployed to Afghanistan, Governor General Michaelle Jean urged soldiers and their families to take pride in the work they are setting out to do. Jean, who is the commander-in-chief of the Canadian Forces, flew to CFB Petawawa in her helicopter to speak to troops who had gathered for Family Day at the base. About 1,600 troops from the base will soon be deployed to Afghanistan. "I know you will be greatly missed by your families and loved ones, but the work you will be doing over there makes us proud, so proud, because we know you are going halfway around the world to stand up for justice and freedom, to help the Afghan people break free from tyranny and oppression," Jean said. She praised the military families who were supportive of their husbands and wives and relatives who will be risking their lives in Afghanistan, saying they make the "sacrifice out of respect for the life your loved one has chosen." Jean suggested the soldiers will be exporting a Canadian belief in freedom and democracy to a land that desperately needs it. "There is no greater act of compassion than to risk everything to help women and men and children you have never met, who live what seems like a world away but whose suffering cannot be ignored....What you will be defending in Afghanistan is the ideal of a fair society where every citizen has rights. A democratic ideal to which all people of this earth should be able to aspire." Before bidding the troops "bonne chance," Jean wished the soldiers a safe return and said she will be carrying each of them in her heart. Chief of Defence Staff Gen. Rick Hillier introduced Jean. Increasing combat activity has made the Afghanistan mission more dangerous for the troops. However, Hillier spoke about the high level of training the soldiers have received and emphasized that they will be using the best equipment available -- from combat boots to Kevlar vests to hydration systems-- when they arrive in Afghanistan. "We have spared no effort and no amount of money to set conditions for success," Hillier said. He described the soldiers as "a flicker of light in a long dark tunnel," and said the deployment is "a mission for 28 million men and women in the worst days and months of their lives who desperately need some help, and they desperately need the kind of help that you can provide. "You are the ones that bring the hope to Afghans that someday their lives will be much better." Hillier said Canada and other NATO nations operating in Afghanistan are defeating the Taliban. "The Taliban are losing the last few areas where they used to rest and recuperate and plan and train," he said. While some experts argue the Taliban are getting stronger, Defence Minister Gordon O'Connor told CTV's Question Period those experts are wrong. "I think they've met us head on and we have performed very, very well," he said. With a report from CTV's Robert Fife
Canadians, coalition hold medical outreach for villagers in Taliban countryCanadians, coalition hold medical outreach for villagers in Taliban country
Monday, June 26, 2006
GUMBAD, Afghanistan (CP) - With a rifle in one hand and medical supplies in the other, Capt. Marilynn Chenette strikes an image that just about captures the essence of the coalition's mission in Afghanistan - security and humanitarian aid. On Monday a medical team of Canadians, Americans and Afghans jammed aboard two British Chinook helicopters and landed deep in Taliban country to hold what the military calls a village medical outreach. Within minutes of the choppers' noisily thumping down the jagged valley, hundreds of poor farmers and their children, some with herds of goats and cattle in tow, began lining up to wait in the hot sun. For many it will be their first time ever seeing a doctor. "We are here to help these people, we want to make them healthier," said Chenette, a health administrator with the Edmonton-base 1 Field Ambulance, who strides around carrying a C-5 rifle. The medical team hopes to cajole the villagers into taking de-worming medicine and to vaccinate the children against polio, a disease that is sweeping Afghanistan. "We are telling them basically that this is a safe area today. Come out and we will get you the vaccines." As the doctors and medics set up shop, Canadian and Afghan troops scan the ridges that frown over the compound for Taliban. Three men are seen on a far-off hill watching the gathering crowd. When Afghan National Army soldiers excitedly train a heavy machine-gun on the hill, the trio melts away into the landscape. "There are Taliban all over the place," said Warrant Officer Chris Thorne, who warns the medical team about improvised explosive devices - military jargon for roadside bombs. In the past few months there have been a half-dozen such bomb explosions around Gumbad. Canadian soldiers have dubbed the area IED Alley. Less than a kilometre away from the clinic, two platoons of light armoured vehicles - the LAV IIIs - stand by in reserve in case of trouble. Seemingly oblivious to the threat, groups of men and boys begin entering the compound and into a human assembly line of medical staff. A team of U.S. navy corpsman and an Afghan interpreter patiently explain the benefits of the vaccines to the village elder and his oldest son, who agree to not only take the medicine, but to help administer it. Soon more than 100 of boys are wincing at the "taste" of the vaccines, which they manfully swallow under the intense gaze of their peers. Then it is off to see a doctor with their fathers or grandfathers. The men have not allowed their wives to attend the clinic, although a few of their daughters are on hand to be screened by female doctors. "My son is sick so we have come here for medicine," said Tor Zhan, a shopkeeper in Gumbad, as he lined up to see Afghan and coalition physicians. Many villagers suffer gastrointestinal diseases and other maladies such as scabies and shigella. Others have tuberculosis, improperly set broken limbs and fevers. The doctors give everyone who lines up a checkup and then dispense basic medicine and advice on hygiene. One man brings in his five-year-old daughter who he says has been behaving strangely. In less them a minute the doctors discover that the young girl has cataracts and is almost completely blind. "I'm so sorry but there is nothing we can do," said a doctor through an interpreter. "Her only chance is surgery." When the families finish their medical checks each father is given a blanket full of goodies including rice, beans, a radio, clothes and an Afghan national flag. They are also given a handout urging Taliban to give themselves up. It is written in English, Pashtun and in pictographs. Most of the villagers can't read. In a few hours, the medical team has checked about 450 villagers and inoculated more than 120 children against polio. They also hope they have delivered a message. "We want to show them that their own government is supporting them," Chenette said. "We are here to fight the bad guys and at the same time help them (villagers) out." © The Canadian Press 2006 Canada buying naval vessels
No cash for kin of dead soldierJune 18, 2006 No cash for kin of dead soldier
By DEAN BEEBY
OTTAWA (CP) - The family of a Canadian soldier killed in Afghanistan won't be getting a generous cash settlement from the government after all. Media reports last month said relatives of Pte. Braun Scott Woodfield, who died in a military vehicle accident in November, would be sharing a $250,000 tax-free payment specially authorized by cabinet to compensate for his death while on duty. At the time, a family member said the money was welcome and that they "appreciate the thought." But records released under the Access to Information Act indicate Woodfield's family was excluded from the cabinet order, which gave a total of $1 million to four other families grieving over military deaths. That order was made on April 6, after Veterans Affairs Minister Greg Thompson persuaded his cabinet colleagues to dole out the cash as "ex gratia" payments - that is, as gifts or favours made out of compassion rather than because of any legal requirement. The payments were made to the families of soldiers who died between May 13, 2005, and March 31, 2006, a period that placed them in a legal and administrative limbo. That's because Canada's new Veterans Charter, which for the first time provides a non-taxable $250,000 death benefit, was passed by Parliament on May 13 last year but didn't come into effect until April 1 this year. Deaths that occurred in the interim were not covered by the charter. Thompson called cabinet's unpublicized decision a "heartwarming" gesture. But Woodfield's family will not get a red cent because under the Veterans Charter, only "survivors" can receive the $250,000 death benefit. And because survivors are defined only as dependent children, spouses or common-law partners, Woodfield - as a single man with no children - had no "survivors" to receive any cash. Instead, the cabinet order provided the money to the surviving spouses, common-law partners and children of three men killed in Afghanistan, as well as to the two daughters of Warrant Officer Charles Sheppard, who died in a parachuting accident at Trenton, Ont., on Oct. 3, 2005. "Pte. Woodfield is not eligible because he does not have a survivor or any dependent children," Veterans Affairs spokeswoman Pamela Price confirmed in an interview. She blamed the confusion on a reporter who "guessed wrong" about who might be eligible for the ex gratia payments. Woodfield's mother said the Veterans Charter policy should be changed to help the next-of-kin of unattached soliders. "In a sense, you felt that my son was less of a person, as a single person," Beverley Woodfield of Cow Bay, N.S., said in an interview. Braun Woodfield, 24, sometimes financially supported his sister Lyndi, buying her a laptop for university, for example, she noted. The simpler social world of 50 years ago has changed dramatically, and soldiers now may have complex obligations beyond spouses and children, she said. "I'd like to see a universal entitlement of the benefits, and let the member decide where the benefits should go," said Woodfield. The death benefit under the Veterans Charter is unsual because of its restriction to so-called "survivors," since single soldiers with no children have long been unconditionally eligible for almost all other death benefits provided by the military. For example, the Canadian Forces pays for the funerals and burials of all serving members killed on duty, as it did for Woodfield. National Defence spokesman John Knoll said the Forces also pay supplementary death benefits - two years of salary, tax-free - to the estate of the member or to his or her designated beneficiary. The military will also provide severance pay to the estate or designated beneficiary, seven days' pay for each year of service. And any pension entitlements that had been accrued by deceased members go to a designated beneficiary or the estate if there is no spouse, common-law partner or children, he said. June 25 Military spending plan has many benefits: O'ConnorMilitary spending plan has many benefits: O'Connor
CTV.ca News Staff Defence Minister Gordon O'Connor says his $15 billion spending plan is necessary to update a military that has been hollowed out after years of underspending and cutbacks. Speaking on CTV's Question Period, O'Connor said the massive spending plan is an absolute necessity. "What we're trying to do now is put in place the very basic requirements of the military to be effective. Mobilities - air mobility, army mobility on the ground, and mobility at sea, so that's where we're starting." Beginning this week, O'Connor and Prime Minister Stephen Harper will be visiting four Canadian cities across Canada to build support for the plan -- which makes the largest single defence spending bonanza in the nation's history. The wishlist includes $2 billion for three naval support ships, $1.1 billion for new army trucks, $4.2 billion for 15 heavy-lift helicopters, and $7.5 billion for tactical and heavy-lift aircraft. O'Connor countered allegations that he and Chief of the Defence Staff Gen. Rick Hiller were at odds over the spending plan. Insiders suggested Hillier wanted short-haul tactical airlift capable of landing on rough fields with speed and greater protection, while O'Connor wanted strategic lift. O'Connor told Question Period the military, between 2003 and 2005, made four recommendations to the former Liberal government -- all of which were denied -- to acquire strategic lift. "The military are 100 per cent behind strategic lift and so is Gen. Hillier. The only issue is how much money we have and what we can afford to have," O'Connor said. However, the military will be getting both needs answered -- ending any crossing of swords between Hiller and O'Connor. "Right now the cabinet has provided me with enough money to buy strategic and tactical lift. So there's never been a dispute whatsoever." Under the current arrangement, the Canadian military rents heavy-lift aircraft from Russia and Ukraine whenever it is needed. That arrangement is unacceptable, O'Connor said, because it means those countries can refuse access to the equipment if they disagree with the purpose. The planes are also available on the commercial market, which means the military is competing against other private customers to use the equipment. In addition, the planes are not certified for use in Canada, beyond landing and taking off. In addition to overseas use, the new equipment will give Canada the ability to meet needs within its own borders. "We shouldn't be depending upon other countries. We shouldn't be depending upon other countries ... to lift our troops or our equipment. We've got to be self reliant." O'Connor also dismissed suggestions he has major conflicts of interest on a number of spending announcements, stemming from his days as a lobbyist. Critics have demanded he remove himself from the deal, but he has so far refused and shows no sign of changing his mind. "I don't have any conflicts. I've said this a number of times. I have no relationships to any company at all. I own no shares, I have no revenues, I have nothing from these companies. And if you understand the process, I have no say in who competes and I have no say in who wins." However Ujjal Dosanjh, the Liberal defence critic, told Question Period O'Connor has a number of conflicts because companies he was involved with as a lobbyist are bidding on the new contracts. "If he's not involved then why doesn't he just recuse himself and say I wouldn't be involved. He has never said that. The fact is the people he used to meet with in his previous life as a lobbyist are now reporting to him, some of them are still there, with respect to joint support ships, with respect to trucks, and others, he is conflicted." Dawn Black, the New Democrat defence critic, criticized the speed at which the spending plan has been passed and the changing nature of the military. However, Black supported giving troops the equipment they require. "Of course we support a well equipped Canadian Forces. We're asking the men and women of the Canadian Forces to take on ever more dangerous tasks, so they must be equipped with what they need to do the job we ask them to do." Helicopter contract would be Bell's biggestHelicopter contract would be Bell's biggest
Part of us$2B pact
Saturday, June 24, 2006 MONTREAL - Bell Helicopter Textron Inc.'s Canadian unit expects to find out in the next two weeks whether it has won the largest contract in its 20-year history, part of a US$2-billion-plus deal to supply the U.S. military with 322 light utility helicopters. Bell Helicopter, which would do about half the manufacturing of the choppers at its Mirabel, Que., plant and finish them in Texas, is one of four groups vying for the deal, expected to be valued at more than US$2-billion. Bell's 412EP is up against the UH-145 by American Eurocopter and Sikorsky Aircraft; the UH139 by AgustaWestland and L-3 Communications Holdings; and the MD Explorer by MD Helicopter. The U.S. Army is planning to use the aircraft at commands and National Guard units for general purpose, non-combat missions. It needs them to replace ageing aircraft as well as Black Hawk choppers that had been performing domestic duties since the Cold War ended but are needed again on the front lines in Iraq and elsewhere. The army said on June 2 it expected to announce the winning bidder within 30 days. "We're confident," said Michel Legault, director of business development with Bell Helicopter Textron Canada. "We think our helicopter has the most proven reliability of all the copters. We'd like to think we have the best bid in to the U.S. government." There are 800 of the 412s in service; the biggest customer is Canada's military, with about 100 choppers. But it is a civilian 'copter also used to transport oil workers out to offshore rigs. The helicopters are one of eight types of civilian choppers made at Mirabel. Winning the contract would be good news for Montreal-area suppliers, notably engine supplier Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. But aerospace analyst Richard Aboulafia of the Teal Group in Fairfax, Va., said Bell will likely lose to Eurocopter/Sikorsky because its birds cost less -- US$4-million apiece, compared with Bell's US$7-million price. Europter's parent, EADS, is keen to increase its share of U.S. defence spending, and its partner is a unit of U.S. defence giant United Technologies Corp. "I'd say Bell is tied for second" with the others, Mr. Aboulafia said. © National Post 2006 Damn the torpedo: navy loses practice weapon off British Columbia coastDamn the torpedo: navy loses practice weapon off British Columbia coast
Sunday, June 25, 2006 OTTAWA (CP) - Beachcombers in British Columbia take note: the navy has lost an expensive practice torpedo that may wash up on shore somewhere. The three-metre-long torpedo, containing no warhead or explosives, sank unexpectedly in January after it was launched from a military frigate near Victoria, a newly disclosed document shows. HMCS Vancouver fired the dummy weapon just off the entrance to Esquimalt Harbour to make sure the ship-based firing system was working properly. The frigate has two launching tubes on each side at midship for attacking submarines. But instead of automatically ejecting its weights and bobbing up to the surface again, the fibreglass cylinder simply sank beneath the waves off Vancouver Island - a "rare occurrence," according to the navy. The frigate spent three hours in vain looking for the errant object, known as a "hottorp" for Honeywell Operational Training Torpedo, the name given by the original manufacturer. "All firing conditions were met and torpedo launched successfully, but did not resurface," says a censored report on the incident, obtained under the Access to Information Act. "The hottorp may rise to the surface . . . and eventually wash ashore. . . . (Request) that local authorities be notified in case the torpedo surfaces at a later time." A spokesman for the navy said the device, about one-third of a metre in diameter, remains missing in action. "It hasn't popped up yet," Cmdr. Rod Hughes said in an interview from Esquimalt, B.C. "We think it's sitting on the bottom out there. We're actually going to go back and look for it this summer. We'll probably recover it." The training model originally cost about $20,000, but they're no longer being manufactured anywhere. The navy, which has a few dozen left in its inventory, recently received a quote for $75,000 to build another one, but turned down the offer as too expensive. The military plans to use side-scan sonar this summer to try to locate the torpedo, and a remote-controlled submersible to attempt to recover it. But the navy has also notified local civil authorities to be on the watch for a suspicious-looking log that may have been tossed ashore. © The Canadian Press 2006 Special forces terror unit planned for B.C.Special forces terror unit planned for B.C.
Joint Task Force 2 commandos could be moved to protect West Coast from attack
Saturday, June 24, 2006 The Defence Department is looking at creating a special forces unit based on the West Coast to deal with maritime threats, a move that could see Ottawa-based Joint Task Force 2 commandos spending more time at sea. Defence officials are releasing few details about the unit, but privately military officers say consideration might be given to using members of JTF2 at Canadian Forces Base Comox on Vancouver Island. Rear Admiral Roger Girouard, commander of maritime forces in the Pacific, noted in a recent speech there are plans in the works to establish a special forces unit at the base. Such a unit would be made up of navy personnel and specially trained officers, he said in a speech to the chamber of commerce in Victoria. Rear Admiral Girouard did not release further details, but noted that ferries and cruise ships are particularly vulnerable to a terror attack. Gerry Pash, a Victoria-based military public affairs official, said the admiral was speaking generally about defence forces in the Pacific region. "(The admiral) was trying to be as open and transparent as he could be within possibilities, but no decisions have been made," he said. "People are looking at things all the time." Additional inquiries about the potential for a B.C.-based special forces unit were referred to National Defence headquarters in Ottawa. But headquarters defence spokeswoman Karen Johnstone said the department would not comment on special forces issues. Currently, JTF2 handles threats on the country's coasts. It is unknown whether the Defence Department is considering a similar unit for the East Coast. During the federal election campaign, the Conservatives promised to boost the numbers of regular force military personnel in British Columbia. Vancouver will host the Winter Olympics in 2010 and defence planners are already laying the groundwork to protect that event from a terror attack. JTF2 is to be on standby to respond to a crisis at the Games. The Canadian military is in the process of substantially boosting the size of its special forces, which will number around 2,300 by the end of the decade. That includes not only JTF2 and chemical, nuclear and bio- logical defence specialists, located in Ottawa, but a special forces helicopter squadron and a new special forces regiment at Canadian Forces Base Petawawa. JTF2 also has a cadre of scuba divers and other specialists, as well as high-speed rigid inflatable boats for its naval missions. On Thursday, the Senate's defence committee released a report which called on JTF2 to be capable of reaching the location of a terrorist attack or emergency incident anywhere in Canada within nine hours. JTF2 officers have acknowledged the unit must further develop such skills if it's to deal with a nightmare scenario involving terrorists seizing a ship or outfitting a vessel with a weapon of mass destruction and detonating it on Canadian territory. In such a case, the unit would be used to take control of the vessel from terrorists while another specialized military team would deal with the weapon. Some security experts have been predicting that with increased vigilance over the world's air transportation system after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on the U.S., groups such as al-Qaeda would shift their attention to ground and maritime transportation. © The Ottawa Citizen 2006 June 23 Soldiers' injuries up concern over lack of helicoptersSoldiers' injuries up concern over lack of helicopters
KANDAHAR (Jun 22, 2006)
Canadian troops who suffered casualties yesterday have a keen interest in a proposal going to Treasury Board in Ottawa today, involving the proposed purchase of heavy lift helicopters. Two separate attacks yesterday that left six Canadians wounded -- one seriously -- raised questions about the Canadian Forces' lack of transport helicopters to handle resupply missions. The Edmonton-based Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry battle group relies almost solely on vehicle resupply convoys that usually stick to roads or dried riverbeds called wadis. Having helicopters, such as big, twin-rotor Chinooks, would be a plus, conceded Major Mario Couture, a Canadian Forces spokesman at the coalition base in Kandahar. The proposed purchase of about a dozen Chinooks is part of a plan already endorsed by cabinet to also buy up to 17 new-generation Hercules transport planes, three supply and troop carrier ships and 1,000 replacements for 24-year old trucks. That plan is, in turn, part of a $15-billion proposal to re-equip Canada's military. There's been no indication when the equipment might be delivered. Meanwhile, Couture said the coalition is doing all that it can to mitigate the risks to its soldiers involved in resupply missions. "We adapt to threats, we use several types of vehicles, we are using the best equipment that we can," he said. "We vary our routes but unfortunately we cannot mitigate the risk to zero." One of the bombing sites has been the location of at least five other roadside bomb attacks in the past, including one April 22 that killed four Canadian soldiers. Ten other soldiers were wounded in those explosions. The Canadian Forces once had Chinooks but Ottawa sold them to the Dutch in the early 1990s. Defence analysts say the lack of such an airlift capability is a big problem. "We'd have less need for roadbound convoys if we had the Chinook, plain and simple," said David Bercuson, a professor at the University of Calgary's Centre for Military and Strategic Studies. About 7,000 coalition combat soldiers are involved in the operation to root out Taliban in Kandahar, Helmand, Zabul and Uruzgan provinces. Harper to unveil $15-billion in defence spendingHarper to unveil $15-billion in defence spendingGLORIA GALLOWAY Globe and Mail Update Ottawa — Prime Minister Stephen Harper will announce the purchase of trucks, planes, ships and helicopters next week when he unveils a massive $15-billion procurement package for Canada's military. The spending will be detailed at four separate events in four cities. It comes after years of complaints by the military that armed forces personnel have been forced to operate with aging equipment that requires endless repair. Gen. Rick Hillier, the Chief of Defence Staff was all smiles on Wednesday when he spoke to reporters and senators about the refurbishing of the service — with good reason. Prime Minister Stephen Harper will travel to Halifax on Monday to make the first announcement of three new supply ships at a cost of $2.1-billion, sources have told The Globe and Mail. Those ships will replace vessels that were launched nearly 40 years ago. Tuesday's announcement will take place in Quebec where the government will indicate plans to buy trucks worth $1.1-billion. The truck purchase in that province will be presented as a tradeoff for the fact that the specifications for new airplanes, to be announced at the end of the week, will be tailored to those built by U.S.-based Boeing. Quebec's giant aerospace industry had been lobbying for a piece of the airplane procurement. Mr. Harper will head to Edmonton on Wednesday to release the requirements for 15 new medium to heavy-lift helicopters. Those are expected to cost $4.2-billion and have been touted by the military as means of ferrying goods and supplies in theatres of conflict, like Afghanistan, without having to travel by land over dangerous terrain. Then, on Thursday, the final announcement of the new planes will be made at CFB Trenton in Ontario. That purchase is likely to be the most controversial, given the intensely competitive market for aircraft. The Liberals — and other airplane manufacturers -- have been complaining for months that the Conservatives have rigged the competition for large, strategic lift planes to suit the Globemaster C-17s made by Boeing. In fact, the government will say it is going to buy four of those planes at a cost of $3-billion. But other companies will be invited to submit competing tenders. The government will also say it is going to $4.6-billion worth of tactical-lift planes to replace the aging fleet of Hercules aircraft which will start becoming obsolete before the end of the decade. In the end, the $15-billion worth of equipment to be announced next week will constitute one of the largest packages of military purchases ever tendered in Canada. The military is not one of the Conservative government's five priorities. But it will be able to go into an election — even if one is called early next year — saying it has made headway on the military file. Minister of National Defence Gordon O'Connor's office remained tight-lipped about the impending announcments Thursday, but reiterated its support for the Canadian forces. "Canada's military has seen 13 years of neglect under the previous Liberal government. Our new government is committed to ensuring that we fund the military and give them the equipment they need to do the jobs we ask them to do," a spokesman for Mr. O'Connor said Thursday. "When this government has an announcement to make — we will make it." With a report from Scott Deveau
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|